|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Completing
the Square: In the vertex form of the quadratic, the fact that (h, k) is the vertex makes sense, if you think about it for a minute. The quantity "x – h" is squared, so it is always zero or greater; it can never be negative. Suppose that "a" is positive, so a(x – h)2 is zero or positive. Then, whatever x-value you choose, you're always taking k and adding a(x – h)2 to it. That is, the smallest value y can be is just k; otherwise y will equal k plus something positive. When does y equal only k? When x – h, the squared part, is zero; in other words, when x = h. So the lowest value that y can go to, y = k, will only happen if x = h. And the lowest point on a positive quadratic is of course the vertex. If you suppose that "a" is negative, the exact same reasoning holds, except that you're always taking k and subtracting the squared part from it, so the highest value y can achieve is y = k at x = h. And the highest point on a negative quadratic is of course the vertex. But they don't usually give you the quadratic in vertex form. They usually give you the quadratic in the regular y = ax2 + bx + c format. How do you convert from the regular format to the vertex format? By using the technique of completing the square. Here's an example:
Follow this procedure: Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2006-2008 All Rights Reserved
In this case, since a = 3, and three is positive, then this is a right-side-up parabola, and the vertex, (h, k) = ( –1/3 , –4/3 ), is the lowest point. Why did I reformat things in that last line? Because the formula for the vertex form is y = a(x – h)2 + k. In other words, what was subtracted to get "x + 1/3"? I had to have subtracted a negative, –1/3, because x – ( –1/3 ) = x + 1/3, because the negatives cancel. And what was added to get "–4/3"? I had to have added a negative number, – 4/3, because + (–4/3) = –4/3. It's easy to confuse yourself at that final stage, by trying to read off the vertex as " (h, k) = (whatever number is inside the squared part, whatever the other number is) ", without noticing the fact that the h-part is subtracted and the k-part is added. If you take care to ensure that you have your quadratic completely converted to vertex form by being careful of the signs, then you'll be able to avoid one of the most commonly-made mistakes for these problems. Make sure you practice this until you can consistently interpret your results correctly. By the way, did you notice that the vertex coordinates weren't whole numbers? Teachers are starting to figure out that students are guessing the vertex from the pretty pictures in their graphing calculators, and they know that students often have the idea (from the abysmal job the high schools are doing with their "estimation" lessons) that all answers are always either whole numbers or "neat" fractions. For instance, if the calculator screen estimates a vertex as being at (0.48, 0.98), many students will assume that the answer must "really" be (0.5, 1), instead of, say, ( 12/25, 49/50 ). So to check that students really do know how to find the vertex (and not just guess a decimal approximation from a picture), teachers are giving more complicated exercises. If you have been told that you should know this technique for finding the vertex, rest assured that your teacher has ways of checking whether you have really learned this. Don't plan on using calculator cheats. Top | 1 | 2 | Return to Index Next >>
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2006-2008 Elizabeth Stapel | About | Terms of Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|